EnviroMail_10

FOREVER PFAS CHEMICALS IN SOILS

download PFD
EnviroMail_10_Europe_PFAS forever chemicals in soil

There is no need to discuss their presence anymore; they are ubiquitous, they are „forever chemicals“. More than anything else, the issue of their remediation has to be addressed. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in soil are persistent environmental contaminants with potential far-reaching impact. These synthetic compounds, found in various industrial and consumer products, exhibit remarkable stability and resistance to degradation.
Their widespread presence in soil, even in remote locations, poses concerns for both environmental and human health. Investigating PFAS in soil is crucial to comprehend their distribution, persistence, and associated risks. Only then we can discuss strategies to rid the environment of them.

PFAS in soil

Pilot studies have predominantly focused on the presence and movement of PFAS in the atmosphere,

 surface water, and groundwater. Yet, there are growing indications that soils play a crucial role as a substantial reservoir and enduring source of PFAS, both locally and on a broader scale. The prevalence of PFAS in soil is evident across nearly all tested locations, even in remote areas distant from potential PFAS sources. This substantial soil reservoir poses a persistent threat, serving as a long-term contaminant source for surface water, groundwater, the atmosphere, and biota. Notably, concentrations of PFAS in soil at contaminated sites often surpass typical groundwater levels by orders of magnitude, reaching up to parts-per-million levels.

A significant concern arises regarding the long-term migration of PFAS to surface water, groundwater,
and the atmosphere. PFAS can influence soil properties and structures, with reported effects including a decline in soil respiration and water stable aggregates, alongside an increase in soil pH. Furthermore, PFAS alter bacterial communities, boosting the abundance of certain bacteria while reducing overall bacterial diversity even at very low concentrations. The impact of PFAS extends beyond the soil‘s microbial community, contaminating groundwater and accumulating in plants. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of PFAS fate and transport insoil is crucial for effective environmental management.

Sources of PFAS in soil

  • Firefighting foams: Professional Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting 
    exercises, contain PFAS compounds. Accidental releases and training exercises contribute to soil contamination.
  • Industrial discharges: Certain industrial activities producing PFAS-containing products may release these substances into the environment. Industrial  discharges and imp oper waste disposal can result in PFAS entering the soil.
  • Landfills and waste sites: Landfills and waste disposal sites that receive PFAS-containing materials can lead to leaching of these substances into soil. Improper disposal practices contribute to soil contamination.
  • Wastewater treatment plants: Effluents from wastewater treatment plants, which may receive industrial or domestic wastewater containing PFAS, can introduce these compounds into the soil when used for irrigation or discharged into water bodies.
  • Atmospheric deposition: PFAS can settle onto soils through precipitation or air deposition. This source is particularly relevant for areas near industries using or emitting PFAS.
  • Consumer products: Some consumer products, such as water-resistant textiles, non-stick cookware, and food packaging, may contain PFAS. Over time, these products can release PFAS into the environment, contributing to soil contamination.
  • Runoff from contaminated areas: Rainwater runoff from areas with historical PFAS use or contamination can transport these substances into nearby soils.

The Case Study: Analysis of PFAS in randomly selected soils in 2023

The monitoring study of the occurrence of PFAS in soils was conducted in 2023. The study involved the analysis of 209 soil samples.
The analysis focused on 20 PFAS substances, which are currently legislatively required to be monitored in drinking waters (*). The analysis was conducted using the standard method (Table 1) with quantification limits (LOQ) ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 μg/kg DW (Table 1). Approximately 70% of tested samples were negative (below LOQ) for all the analytes (Figure 2). In positive samples, as anticipated, the most frequently detected substances were two compounds: PFOS and PFOA. It is worth noticing that predominantly long-chain PFAS (PFDA, PFNA, PFNS, etc.) can be detected in soils. Additionally, alongside the mentioned substances, compounds 6:2 FTS and FOSA are present in soils quite often.

Occurence of PFAS in soil samples

The profiles of detected individual PFAS in contaminated samples are presented in Figures 3 and 4. It is evident, and expectable, that PFOS was detected at the highest concentration levels (Figure 3) significantly surpassing other analytes. The profile of other PFAS (without PFOS) and their concentration levels are shown in Figure 4. In practice, it is clear that the representation of PFAS in soils can vary, primarily depending on the sampled location.

Literature cited:

Y. Wang, U. Munir, Q. Huang. Occurrence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in soil: Sources, fate, and remediation. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/jseh.2023.100004
M. L. Brusseau, R. H. Anderson, B. Guo. PFAS Concentrations in Soils: Background Levels versus Contaminated Sites. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140017

Related EnviroMails / Europe

The Case Study:
Analysis of PFAS in randomly
selected soils in 2023

​

Print